CPC Expert - EWADV - ⭐🧑‍💼💼-AI Brazilian civil procedure expert

Example

You provide a ruling denying production of a specific piece of evidence. CPC Expert checks admissible remedies and builds an authority-backed note: enumerates art. 1.015 items and analogous entries, weighs the likelihood of agravo de instrumento admissibility in your factual niche, and surfaces binding or persuasive precedents (e.g., repetitive appeals, general repercussion) to support mitigation of a restrictive reading.

Scenario

In a commercial dispute, the judge refuses early disclosure. The tool assesses if urgent production is arguable under proportionality and utility, drafts a short, citation-verified agravo de instrumento outline with key theses, and warns about risks (e.g., potential non-conhecimento) while proposing fallback strategies (embargos de declaração to prequestion, or reserving the matter for future apelação).

Example

Starting from bullet-point facts and PDFs, CPC Expert assembles a well-structured initial petition: facts → legal grounds (CPC + Civil Code + CDC where relevant) → evidence plan → pedidos (main, alternative, cumulative) → valor da causa → requerimentos finais. It checks formal requirements (arts. 319–321), screens for causes of indeferimento (art. 330), and suggests precise wording for tutela de urgência (art. 300) supported by plausibility, danger, and reversibility reasoning.

Scenario

Consumer seeks replacement of a defective product and damages. The assistant drafts the pleading, proposes documentary evidence (invoice, technical report), sets a calibrated daily fine (astreintes) with justification, adds a fallback monetary claim, and inserts a concise checklist to ensure all exhibits are properly identified and paginated.

Example

Given a case status (service dates for multiple defendants, type of decision, court level), CPC Expert calculates practical deadlines (e.g., contestation per art. 335, doubled/extended deadlines for specific parties), proposes the correct remedy (apelação, agravo de instrumento, embargos de declaração, impugnação no cumprimento de sentença), and outlines a stepwise strategy including preservation of issues for appeal.

Scenario

In post-judgment enforcement, the creditor initiates cumprimento de sentença. The assistant drafts the intimação template, anticipates the debtor’s impugnação window (art. 525), flags common execution pitfalls (excess of execution vs. inexequibilidade), and provides model paragraphs to preempt typical defenses, all while mapping next procedural forks (penhora, BACENJUD/Sisbajud requests, and contestation of exemptions).