Report Master-AI academic report generator

Example

Input: 'Produce a 3,000-word literature review on 'interpretable machine learning' with APA 7 citations, include at least 12 peer-reviewed sources, and provide a 150-word conclusion and a one-page annotated bibliography.' Output: A full 3,000-word document with a title page, 200–300-word introduction framing research questions, thematic subsections (e.g., model-agnostic methods, visualization-based interpretability, evaluation metrics), direct synthesis linking studies, critical comparisons, a clearly labeled 150-word conclusion, and a 1-page annotated bibliography. Every in-text citation is matched to a formatted APA reference. Word-count constraints are enforced exactly, with a brief change log noting where trimming occurred.

Scenario

A doctoral student must deliver Chapter 2 (literature review) for their committee. They provide the topic, target length, and a rough reading list. Report Master creates the chapter draft organized by themes requested by the student, produces transition language that links themes to the student's planned research question, and supplies an annotated bibliography the committee can use to assess coverage. The student then iterates with the system to refine emphasis and include additional sources.

Example

Input: 'Draft a PRISMA-style systematic review protocol on digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescents. Include search strategy (databases, boolean strings), inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening workflow, data extraction fields, and a risk-of-bias assessment plan.' Output: A structured protocol with explicit database queries (example boolean strings), PICO/PEO framing, screening flowchart description (to be converted to PRISMA flow diagram), standardized data-extraction templates, recommended risk-of-bias tools (e.g., RoB 2, ROBINS-I) with criteria, and suggested R or Python code skeletons to run meta-analysis (metafor / meta packages) when numeric data are available.

Scenario

A clinical team preparing a systematic review for journal submission needs a publishable protocol and the initial synthesis. Report Master produces the protocol document that the team can register (e.g., PROSPERO), drafts the methods section required by the target journal, creates standardized extraction spreadsheets, and supplies reproducible analysis scripts and plotting templates for forest plots and funnel plots. The team then populates extracted data and runs the scripts locally.

Example

Input: 'Convert this 5,000-word manuscript (raw text supplied) to APA 7 format; ensure all in-text citations appear in the References; enforce 5,000-word limit; produce a checklist of required editorial changes.' Output: A reformatted manuscript with correct headings, margins, and running head per APA 7 (or a journal-specific template if supplied), a matched and alphabetized reference list, flagged citation mismatches with suggested fixes, an audit-style checklist (word count verification, figure/table numbering, caption format), and optional reproducible code blocks for any analyses mentioned. The output includes 'before/after' examples for ambiguous citation cases and explicit instructions for the copyeditor.

Scenario

A research group is preparing a final submission for a high-impact journal with very strict formatting and word limits. Report Master enforces the journal's constraints, trims language in a controlled way (summaries of what was shortened with rationale), ensures every figure/table has an appropriate caption and is referenced in-text, and supplies a submission-ready PDF or structured text that the corresponding author can paste into the journal portal.