cover

Network Engineer GPT-AI network engineering assistant

AI-powered guidance for secure, vendor-grade networking.

logo

A technical and straightforward GPT specializing in Cisco, Juniper, and F5 networking and security.

What are the latest features of Cisco's routers?

How do I configure a Juniper firewall?

Can you explain F5 load balancing techniques?

What are the best security practices for Cisco networks?

Get Embed Code

What is Network Engineer GPT?

Network Engineer GPT is a specialized assistant focused on networking and security across Cisco, Juniper, F5 Networks (BIG-IP), Microsoft Azure, and Amazon Web Services. It is designed to (1) convert business or technical intent into validated architectures and configurations, (2) accelerate troubleshooting with deterministic step-by-step workflows, and (3) embed security and operations best practices into every recommendation. It avoids unsafe guidance (e.g., weakening crypto, bypassing controls) and does not speculate on unreleased features. Examples: • A regional ISP asks for dual-homed BGP edge with graceful failover—Network Engineer GPT produces reference diagrams, IOS-XE/NX-OS configs with MD5 auth, max-prefix, and BFD, and a rollback plan. • A fintech needs Azure–AWS hybrid with on-prem Cisco SD-WAN—Network Engineer GPT proposes Azure vWAN + AWS TGW, BGP design (ASN, communities, filtering), and traffic steering for PCI segments. • A security team must migrate ASA ACLs to Juniper SRX—Network Engineer GPT translates objects/policies, highlights semantic differences (e.g., implicit deny, application vs service), and stages a change window test plan. • An operations team sees intermittentNetwork Engineer GPT overview 5xx on BIG-IP—Network Engineer GPT guides pool health checks, tmsh diagnostics, and suggests an iRule/Local Traffic Policy for path-based routing and slow-start.

Core Functions and How They Are Used

  • Design & Architecture Advisor

    Example

    Hybrid WAN and multi-cloud segmentation: propose a hub-and-spoke with on-prem Cisco SD-WAN (vEdge/IOS-XE SD-WAN) hubs, AWS TGW for region isolation, Azure vWAN for scalable hub, and F5 BIG-IP at DC edges for L7 traffic steering. Include BGP ASN plan, community tags (e.g., 65000:10 for prod), route summarization (/20 per spoke), and failure domains (AZ vs region).

    Scenario

    Input: business requirements (2 Gbps per site, PCI enclave, <50 ms latency), vendor constraints (Cisco+Juniper campus, AWS+Azure), and change window limits. Output: diagrams with data/ctrl-plane flows; capacity math (aggregate throughput, pps, NAT table sizing); HA patterns (active/active TGW attachments, ECMP on CSR1000v); control-plane design (eBGP with GTSM, BFD 300/300/3); QoS mapping (EF for voice, AF31 for call signaling); and security zoning (Azure Firewall Premium for east-west, AWS NACL stateless filters at per-subnet). Deliverables also include a test matrix (fail TGW attachment, AZ outage, BGP flap) and Day-2 monitoring KPIs (BGP session count, route churn, pool member RTT).

  • Configuration, Translation & Automation Generation

    Example

    Given an intent like “dual ISP edge with DDoS-resilient BGP and outbound NAT”: generate Cisco IOS-XE snippets (crypto isakmp keychain if needed, route-maps for community setting, max-prefix with warning-only), Junos equivalents (policy-options, prefix-lists, apply-path), and an F5 BIG-IP AS3 declaration for L7 VIPs. Provide Terraform for AWS (VPC, subnets, TGW attachment, route tables, SGs) and Azure (vWAN hub, connections, UDRs) plus an Ansible playbook to push configs idempotently.

    Scenario

    Input: site variables (loopbacks, ISP ASNs, communities, prefixes). Output: vendor-specific, commented configs with guardrails: • Cisco IOS-XE: prefix-lists + route-maps for outbound tagging; neighbor password; ‘neighbor xx maximum-prefix 500 90 warning-only’; BFD enable. • Junos: ‘groups { BGP-TEMPLATE ... }’ with apply-groups; ‘policy-options community BLOCK-TRANSIT’; ‘multipath’ for ECMP. • F5: AS3 JSON for a HTTPS VIP with clientSSL/serverSSL profiles, health monitors, slow-start ramp, and L7 policy for /api -> pool_api, /web -> pool_web. • Terraform: modules that create TGW/vWAN attachments and propagate routes; variables for CIDR blocks; explicit dependency graph. Includes a rollback bundle and a dry-run plan (Ansible check mode).

  • Troubleshooting Playbooks & Security Hardening

    Example

    OSPF adjacency stuck in EXSTART between Cisco and Juniper; IPsec/IKEv2 tunnel down between ASA and SRX; BIG-IP pool flapping. Provide a binary search workflow: verify L2 (MAC/ARP), L3 (mtu/fragment DF), IGP (hello/dead, network type, MTU mismatch), then policy. Include exact show/trace commands and expected deltas.

    Scenario

    Playbook outputs: • OSPF: Cisco ‘show ip ospf interface’, ‘show ip ospf neighbor detail’; Junos ‘show ospf interface detail’, ‘show ospf neighbor extensive’; check MTU, area type (NSSA vs stub), and authentication. Provide fix: align ‘ip ospf network point-to-point’ or Junos ‘interface-type p2p’, or set ‘ip ospf mtu-ignore’ temporarily with change-control note. • IPsec: compare IKE proposals (AES-GCM-256 vs AES-CBC-256+SHA256), lifetime mismatch, ID types (FQDN vs IP), and NAT-T; commands: ASA ‘show crypto ikev2 sa/detail’, SRX ‘show security ike security-associations detail’; remediation: align proposals, set PFS group, confirm proxy-IDs. • BIG-IP: ‘tmsh show ltm pool all-members detail’, ‘tmsh show sys conn’ to isolate SYN backlog; enable slow-start, increase health-check interval jitter, or tune TCP profiles. Security hardening: enforce SSH v2 only, disable weak ciphers, AAA via TACACS+/RADIUS, logging to SIEM, and baseline templates mapped to CIS benchmarks where applicable.

Who Benefits Most

  • Network/Security Engineers and Architects (Enterprise, Service Provider, MSSP)

    Engineers designing or operating mixed-vendor environments (Cisco campus/SD-WAN, Juniper core/SRX, F5 BIG-IP at DC edges) and extending into Azure/AWS. They benefit from rapid design validation (BGP/OSPF/EVPN patterns, HA topologies), safe configuration generation with vendor translations, and deterministic troubleshooting runbooks that reduce MTTR. Typical goals: accelerate migrations (ASA→SRX, Classic→AS3 on BIG-IP), standardize configs via templates/Ansible, and embed security guardrails (least privilege, encryption standards, logging).

  • Cloud Network Architects, DevOps/SRE, and Platform/SOC/NOC Teams

    Teams building resilient cloud and hybrid platforms who need network-aware automation and security by design. They benefit from Terraform/AS3/Ansible ready-to-adapt snippets; prescriptive patterns like AWS TGW + Azure vWAN interconnect; guidance on routing domains, egress control, and micro-segmentation; and operations playbooks (alert runbooks, KPIs, SLOs). SOC/NOC leverage protocol-centric triage (BGP flap root cause, IPSec rekey storms, L7 VIP instability) and hardening checklists that align changes with compliance without weakening defenses.

How to Use Network Engineer GPT

  • Start here

    Visit aichatonline.org for a free trial without login—no ChatGPT Plus required.

  • Define your objective

    State what you need (e.g., 'Design EVPN-VXLAN for spine–leaf', 'Troubleshoot BGP flap', 'Generate F5 LTM config'). Include vendor/OS and versions (Cisco IOS-XE/NX-OS, Juniper Junos, F5 TMOS, AWS, Azure), topology details, constraints (MTU, security policies), and change window/scope.

  • Provide artifacts

    Paste sanitized configs, logs, and diagrams: running-config snippets, 'show' outputs, Junos 'show | display set', F5 tmsh/AS3, AWS VPC/TGW/route tables, Azure vNet/NSG rules, flow logs, and packet captures (summary). Use clear sections: Task, Context, Constraints, Desired Output, Environment.

  • Request actionable outputs

    Ask for exact commands, config diffs, validation checklists, and rollback plans. Examples: Cisco/Juniper CLI blocks, F5 tmsh/AS3, AWS CLI/Terraform, Azure CLI/Bicep, runbooks (pre-checks/post-checks), and RCA templates. Specify formats (code blocks, tables, ASCII diagrams).

  • Validate and iterate

    Network Engineer GPT usage guideTest in lab first, capture telemetry, and re-run with results for refinement. Follow safety: backup configs, use maintenance windows, and adhere to change-control. Ask for vendor-specific validation steps and failure-domain blast-radius analysis.

  • Troubleshooting
  • Network Design
  • Load Balancing
  • Config Generation
  • Cloud Networking

Five Detailed Q&A About Network Engineer GPT

  • What problems can you solve end-to-end for network and security engineers?

    I deliver vendor-grade designs, configurations, and troubleshooting workflows across Cisco, Juniper, F5, AWS, and Azure. - Design: IP/VLAN plans, BGP/OSPF/IS-IS, EVPN-VXLAN, spine–leaf, HA pairs, WAF/LB topologies, cloud hub-and-spoke. - Configuration: Interface/VRF/BGP/EVPN, F5 LTM/ASM, AWS TGW/VPC routing, Azure vNet/NSG. - Troubleshooting: Methodical isolation plans, telemetry queries, and command sets. - Operations: Runbooks, pre/post checks, MOP/rollback, compliance hardening checklists, and RCA templates.

  • Can you generate vendor-specific configuration with validation and rollback?

    Yes—provide your intent and constraints, and I return configs, verification, and rollback. Examples: - Cisco IOS-XE (OSPF): ``` conf t router ospf 10 network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 passive-interface default no passive-interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/1 end ! verify show ip ospf neigh show ip route ospf ``` - Juniper EVPN-VXLAN (core): ``` set protocols evpn encapsulation vxlan set protocols evpn extended-vni-list 1000-1099 set routing-instances PROD instance-type evpn ``` - F5 LTM pool/VS: ``` tmsh create ltm pool web-pool members add { 10.0.0.10:80 10.0.0.11:80 } monitor http tmsh create ltm virtual web-vs destination 192.0.2.10:80 pool web-pool profiles add { http httpcompression } ``` - AWS routing (CLI): ``` aws ec2 create-route --route-table-id rtb-123 --destination-cidr-block 10.20.0.0/16 --transit-gateway-id tgw-abc ``` - Azure peering (CLI): ``` az network vnet peering create -g RG1 -n spoke1-to-hub --vnet-name spoke1 --remote-vnet hub --allow-forwarded-traffic ``` Each set includes 'pre-checks' (adjacencies/routes/health), 'post-checks', and 'rollback' commands.

  • How do you approach troubleshooting to reduce MTTR?

    I use a disciplined flow: 1) Establish facts (what changed, blast radius, SLOs). 2) Instrument telemetry (interfaces, BFD, BGP/EVPN state, F5 pool/VS stats, cloud flow logs). 3) Isolate by layer (phy/L2/L3/L4–7/policy). 4) Prove or disprove hypotheses with targeted commands. 5) Verify fix and prevent recurrence. Command pack: - Cisco: 'show interface status', 'show ip bgp summary', 'show ip route 10.0.0.0', 'ping / traceroute vrf'. - Juniper: 'show route table inet.0 10.0.0.0/16', 'show bgp summary', 'monitor traffic interface ...'. - F5: 'tmsh show ltm pool', 'tmsh show ltm virtual', 'tcpdump -i 0.0:nnn host X'. - AWS/Azure: query VPC/NSG flow logs and route tables; confirm TGW/UDR symmetry.

  • What are your boundaries and safety considerations?

    I do not execute changes or scans; I generate guidance only. I avoid instructions that facilitate unauthorized access, exploitation, or policy violations. I do not speculate on unreleased features. I recommend backups, change control, least privilege, and staged rollouts (canary, blue/green). I also provide compliance-minded hardening (SSH ciphers, AAA/RBAC, logging, secure defaults) and explicit rollback plans.

  • Can you help with automation and IaC across vendors?

    Yes—I'll translate intent into automation-ready artifacts and validation. - Ansible (Cisco example): ``` - hosts: edge gather_facts: no tasks: - ios_config: lines: - router bgp 65000 - neighbor 192.0.2.2 remote-as 65001 ``` - F5 AS3 (snippet concept): declarative tenant/app, pool members, monitors. - AWS/Azure: CLI sequences and Terraform/Bicep patterns for VPC/vNet, TGW/UDR/NSG, and security baselines. - I include idempotency notes, drift checks, and post-deploy validation commands.

cover