cover

DMARCレポート分析 ver1-AI DMARC report analyzer

AI-powered DMARC analysis for fast remediation

logo

DMARCレポートのXMLファイルの内容をペーストしてください。レポートの各レコードの内容とSPF、DKIM、DMARCの認証結果を表形式で示します。応答がおかしいと感じた場合は、「New chat」から新しく会話を始めてください。DMARC認証の判定は間違う場合があります(調整中)。レポート内容の可視化と問題の発見にご利用ください。

Get Embed Code

Introduction to DMARCレポート分析 ver1

DMARCレポート分析 ver1 is a specialized tool designed to help organizations analyze and interpret DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance) reports. DMARC is a widely adopted email authentication protocol that helps domain owners protect their email domains from unauthorized use, often to prevent phishing or spoofing attacks. The main purpose of DMARCレポート分析 ver1 is to streamline the complex process of analyzing DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, providing organizations with clear, actionable insights into the status of their email security setup. These reports are generated by mail receivers to inform domain owners about how their emails are being handled with respect to authentication mechanisms like SPF (Sender Policy Framework) and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail). DMARCレポート分析 ver1 simplifies this data, making it easier to understand patterns, identify vulnerabilities, and improve email security configurations.

Main Functions of DMARCレポート分析 ver1

  • DMARCレポート分析 ver1DMARC Report Parsing and Visualization

    Example

    The tool automatically parses raw DMARC reports, which are usually provided in XML format, and presents them in a user-friendly dashboard with charts and tables. This makes it easy for users to quickly interpret the report data without needing to manually sift through complex XML code.

    Scenario

    A marketing team at a company receives numerous DMARC reports from email service providers about the status of their outbound emails. Using DMARCレポート分析 ver1, the team can easily visualize whether their emails are passing or failing SPF and DKIM checks, and if any spoofing attempts are being detected, helping them act on this information quickly.

  • Identification of Authentication Failures and Misconfigurations

    Example

    DMARCレポート分析 ver1 identifies specific failures in SPF and DKIM authentication and flags potential misconfigurations, such as incorrect DNS records or domain alignment issues.

    Scenario

    A domain administrator notices that legitimate marketing emails are sometimes ending up in spam folders. By using the DMARCレポート分析 ver1 tool, they are able to pinpoint SPF misconfigurations or improper DKIM signing in their outbound emails, allowing them to adjust their authentication settings to ensure proper email delivery.

  • Detailed Forensic Report Analysis

    Example

    The tool provides an in-depth analysis of forensic reports (or failure reports), which provide information about individual messages that failed DMARC checks. This allows organizations to track down the source of email fraud or phishing attempts.

    Scenario

    A company suspects a phishing attack is being carried out using their domain. By analyzing the forensic reports generated by DMARCレポート分析 ver1, the security team can see the exact emails that failed DMARC checks, identify the IP addresses responsible, and block them to prevent further abuse of their domain.

Ideal Users of DMARCレポート分析 ver1

  • Email Security Administrators

    These users are responsible for managing and maintaining email security protocols within an organization. They would benefit from DMARCレポート分析 ver1 as it provides comprehensive, easy-to-read reports that allow them to monitor and improve the organization’s email authentication mechanisms. The tool helps them identify authentication failures and improve the domain’s reputation by ensuring that legitimate emails pass DMARC checks while blocking malicious or spoofed emails.

  • Marketing Teams

    Marketing teams that rely on email campaigns to engage with customers are also key users. These teams benefit from DMARCレポート分析 ver1 by gaining insights into how their emails are being received by email providers and whether their marketing emails are being flagged as spam or failing authentication checks. By using the tool, marketing teams can fine-tune their email practices and ensure that their legitimate marketing emails are delivered to their audience’s inboxes, thus improving customer engagement.

  • IT Security and Incident Response Teams

    These teams would use DMARCレポート分析 ver1 to monitor potential security threats, such as phishing attacks or domain spoofing attempts. The forensic analysis capabilities of DMARCレポート分析 ver1 would be particularly valuable in tracking and analyzing fraudulent email activity, helping the organization respond to incidents quickly and effectively. For example, in case of a potential breach, these teams can trace the source of suspicious emails and block malicious actors from exploiting the organization’s domain.

  • Domain Owners and Managers

    Organizations or individuals who own and manage email domains are another primary user group. They would use DMARCレポート分析 ver1 to implement and monitor DMARC policies effectively, ensuring that their domain is not exploited for fraudulent activities like phishing or spoofing. By leveraging the tool, they can easily assess the effectiveness of their DMARC policy and adjust it as needed to increase security and email deliverability.

How to use DMARCレポート分析 ver1

  • Visit aichatonline.org for a free trial without login, also no need for ChatGPT Plus.

    Open the site to start using the tool immediately — no account or ChatGPT Plus subscription required. This provides quick access for one-off checks or evaluation.

  • Prepare and upload DMARC aggregate reports

    Prerequisites: obtain DMARC aggregate (RUA) XML files from your report receiver (mail provider, MTA, or XML exports from your reporting service). The tool accepts standard DMARC aggregate XML. Have at least one recent XML file ready; multiple files improve trend detection.

  • Parse, review, and validate parsed table

    After uploading, the tool parses every record and displays a table including header_from, SPF domain, all DKIM signatures (with selectors) and results. Verify that the parser shows correct header_from, SPF domain, DKIM domains, and authentication results. Use the built-in grouping for identical top-level/second-level labels (e.g., it consolidates identical records as "*.aaa.com").

  • Use AI-assisted diagnostics and export findings

    The AI highlights why records passed/failed DMARC (SPF alignment, DKIM alignment, ARC exceptions), suggests remediation (SPF/DKDMARCレポート分析 guideIM fixes, sender alignment, and policy tuning), and can export CSV/JSON for SIEM or ticketing systems. Use filters (by source IP, result, domain) to focus on high-volume or failing sources.

  • Follow privacy, sampling, and best-practice tips

    Tips for optimal use: keep reports private (do not post full XML publicly), analyze multiple days before changing org policy, watch for high-count IPs, treat ARC/exception cases carefully, and validate suggested DNS changes in a test subdomain before global rollout. Regularly re-run analysis after remediation.

  • Reporting
  • Compliance
  • Threat Hunting
  • Incident Response
  • Forensics

Common questions about DMARCレポート分析 ver1

  • What file formats and sizes are supported?

    The tool accepts standard DMARC aggregate XML (RUA) files produced by receivers and most MTA reporting services. It also accepts zipped archives containing multiple XMLs. For very large single-day feeds, split by hour or compress; the tool will parse multi-file uploads and merge results into the unified table.

  • How does the tool decide DMARC pass or fail?

    It follows DMARC decision logic: first check SPF alignment (SPF result pass/softfail AND envelope_from domain matches header_from); if that meets the condition it marks the record as DMARC pass. If not, it evaluates DKIM signatures — if any DKIM signature passes and its d= domain aligns with header_from, DMARC is pass. If neither condition is met, DMARC is fail. ARC or special metadata that affects outcomes is annotated as exceptions.

  • Can it handle multiple DKIM signatures per message?

    Yes. Every DKIM signature found in a record is listed with its selector, d= domain, and verification result. If any single DKIM signature passes and aligns with header_from, the record is considered DMARC pass per the tool's decision flow. The table preserves all signatures so you can audit which signing source succeeded or failed.

  • How private and secure is uploaded data?

    Uploaded DMARC XMLs typically contain IPs, counts, and domains but not full message bodies. The tool advises keeping files private. For sensitive deployments, use isolated environments or on-premise instances if available; otherwise, avoid sharing raw XML publicly. The AI flags potentially sensitive fields and offers redaction advice before export or sharing.

  • What remediation guidance does the AI provide?

    After analysis the AI provides prioritized recommendations: fix SPF includes and alignment, ensure DKIM selectors are current and signing the header_from domain, remove stale third-party senders or add authorized senders to SPF/DKIM, and advise policy changes (none → quarantine → reject) based on failure rates and sources. It also suggests testing approaches and DNS change validation steps.

cover