Developmental EditorBot - CE 101-AI developmental editing
AI-powered developmental edits for clarity, flow, and impact.
Paste in your content and I'll suggest developmental edits to make it overall a stronger piece. ➡️ Learn more at contentediting101.com
Get Embed Code
Related Tools
Writing Assistant
Helps you copyedit and proofread your writing. Writing Assistant can make mistakes. Don't forget to read the edited passage.
ChatID
Generate learning artifacts such as a needs analysis, instructional design document, project plan, etc. tailored to your needs. Developed by Instructional Design Central (IDC)
💻 Professional Coder by awesome-prompts
A GPT expert at solving programming problems, automatic programming, one-click project generation. Same prompt as the original one made by awesome-prompts, currently unavailable.
✏️All-around Writer (Professional Version)
A professional writer📚 who specializes in writing all types of content (essays, novels, articles, copywriting)...
5e Developer
DnD 5e expert in monsters, spells, items, and lore.
专刊标题助手
帮助用户为专刊拟定吸引人的标题，快速且流畅地提供反馈。
Developmental EditorBot - CE 101: What it is and why it exists
Developmental EditorBot - CE 101 is a specialist AI for high-level editing: structure, logic, flow, completeness, relevance, and impact. It’s designed to make drafts clearer, tighter, and more persuasive—without flattening the writer’s voice. The core design principles: (1) diagnose content using a forensic checklist (Claim–Support–Takeaway; What–Why–How; audience fit); (2) surface every meaningful improvement opportunity; (3) synthesize overlapping fixes into sharper, fewer, higher-leverage edits; (4) keep the author’s style intact. Deliverable: a numbered, location-referenced report of developmental edits (not line edits), each with a rationale and a precise, voice-matched suggestion. Example (micro): Before: "We’re customer-obsessed. That’s why our NPS is high." Diagnosis: Claim is vague; support is circular; no takeaway. After (voice-safe): "Claim: We answer every ticket within 2 hours. Support: Median first response is 41 minutes; churn fell 18% in Q2. Takeaway: If uptime + replies matter, we’re the safe bet." Scenario (blog section): An article repeats “Consistency wins” three times. CE 101 flags redundancyDevelopmental EditorBot overview, inserts missing Why (compounding trust; algorithm preference) and How (weekly cadence template; simple KPI), then ends the section with a concrete takeaway ("Ship one useful post/week for 8 weeks; watch save-rate and replies").
Core functions and how they play out in the real world
Structural & logical editing (Claim–Support–Takeaway + What–Why–How)
Example
Draft paragraph: "AI will transform sales. Teams should adapt." CE 101 flags: vague claim, thin support, no reader action. Suggests: (1) Narrow the claim ("inbound qualification within SMB SaaS"); (2) Add evidence (lead response time cut from 18h → 3m at XCo; 12% lift in SQLs); (3) Close with takeaway/How ("Pilot an AI triage bot on low-intent leads for 30 days; success = reply time <5m, SQL rate +8%").
Scenario
B2B SaaS thought-leadership post. Steps: map each paragraph to Claim/Support/Takeaway; tag unsupported lines; insert examples, numbers, or user anecdotes; convert generic advice to a testable next step. Outcome: post moves from 'opinions' to 'actionable strategy' while sounding like the author.
Editing synthesis & prioritization (merge overlapping fixes into one decisive change)
Example
Intro has three problems: weak hook, buried stakes, no audience. Instead of 3 separate fixes, CE 101 proposes one synthesized move: rewrite the first 4 sentences to (a) name the reader, (b) state the cost of inaction, (c) promise a concrete outcome. Before: "Content is important. Many teams struggle. This post shares thoughts." Synthesis rewrite: "If your demo calendar is an ice bath, it’s not your product—it’s your content engine. In 7 minutes, I’ll show you the 3-post cadence that filled ours (from 4 demos/week to 19)."
Scenario
Seed-stage pitch deck. Issues: problem slide vague, market slide abstract, traction slide buried. CE 101 synthesizes: open with a one-line pain + proof ("10k failed checkouts/mo across 120 stores; our plugin recovered 31% in pilot"), then fold market sizing into the same narrative line, then surface traction within the first 90 seconds. Result: fewer slides changed, but the story lands.
Voice-safe rewrites & audience alignment (keep the vibe, sharpen the aim)
Example
Writer voice: punchy, a bit cheeky. Draft line: "We care a lot about customers." Voice-matched rewrite: "We call customers back before their coffee cools." Audience alignment add-on: For enterprise buyers, append proof and next step: "Median first response: 41m. If that matters, book the 15-min walk-through—no sales trap."
Scenario
Creator newsletter. The writer uses short, rhythmic lines. CE 101 preserves cadence while adding clarity and CTA. It proposes A/B endings (soft CTA vs. hard CTA) matched to the audience’s readiness, explains tradeoffs, and recommends one based on the piece’s purpose (share → save → reply → click).
Who benefits most
Founders, product marketers, and sales leaders shipping persuasive artifacts (decks, one-pagers, landing pages)
They need clarity, proof, and momentum. CE 101 turns fuzzy value props into tight claims with evidence and an obvious next step. Benefits: faster stakeholder buy-in, cleaner narratives for fundraising/sales, and fewer revision loops because suggestions are synthesized and voice-safe.
Nonfiction authors, researchers, consultants, and content marketers publishing long-form (essays, reports, newsletters, thought leadership)
They have expertise but risk meandering structure or missing takeaways. CE 101 audits logic (Claim–Support–Takeaway; What–Why–How), fills evidence gaps with suggested data types or examples, preserves tone, and ends sections with emulatable takeaways/CTAs—turning knowledgeable drafts into compelling reads that drive replies, shares, and leads.
How to Use Developmental EditorBot - CE 101
Visit aichatonline.org for a free trial without login, also no need for ChatGPT Plus.
Open the tool page and start a new session instantly; no sign-up friction.
Prepare your draft and goals
Have your text ready (blog, landing page, memo, paper, or chapter) plus: target reader, objective (e.g., convert, persuade, inform), constraints (length, tone), and any must-include points. Tip: add 3–5 lines of sample writing to lock in voice.
Paste content with context
Paste the full draft. Prepend a brief brief: audience, desired outcome, style cues (e.g., punchy, formal, playful), and any deadlines. Common use cases: positioning pages, investor memos, academic sections, sales emails, case studies, fiction scenes.
Review the structured report
You’ll get a numbered, bolded developmental report covering Claim–Support–Takeaway, What–Why–How, section-level takeaways/CTAs, and other structural fixes—plus synthesized suggestions where multiple edits overlap.
Ask for rewrites by section, voice-calibrated examples, or synthesis across edits (e.g., merge #3, #5). Tip: request alternative versions (conservative vs bold) and a final pass for flow after you apply changes.
Try other advanced and practical GPTs
Conlang Creator and Enhancer
AI-powered conlang design and evolution, end-to-end.
产业链分析专家0315_v2
AI-powered industry-chain mapping & scoring.
Anti-GPT
AI-powered text refinement for any need.
Assistente Acadêmico (Resumos e Resenhas Críticas)
AI-powered academic summaries and critical reviews.
Medical Linguist
AI-powered medical rewording with precision.
Desktop Application Developer
AI-powered copilot for rapid, robust desktop apps.
Beautiful.ai Presentation Maker
AI-powered slides from outline to wow.
The Simulation
AI-powered solutions for your creative needs.
API Builder 👉🏼 OpenAPI Schema
AI-powered OpenAPI schema design, docs, and SDKs.
APUSH Tutor
AI-powered APUSH notes, practice, and feedback.
CSS
AI-powered CSS expert for building, debugging, and optimizing styles.
PowerShell
AI-powered PowerShell scripting and automation.
- Academic Writing
- Marketing Copy
- Product Pages
- Investor Memos
- Fiction Drafts
Developmental EditorBot - CE 101: Detailed Q&A
What makes Developmental EditorBot different from grammar checkers?
It’s a structural and strategic editor. Instead of fixing commas, it diagnoses clarity, logic, and persuasion: does each section make a clear claim, back it with evidence, and land a takeaway? Do readers know what, why, and how? You get a prioritized, numbered report with bolded issues and concrete, voice-matched fixes, including synthesized recommendations when multiple edits overlap.
How do you preserve my unique voice while suggesting major changes?
Provide a short style sample and cues (e.g., short, punchy, a bit cheeky; or formal, academic). I mirror cadence, sentence length, and lexical choices. Suggestions use your writeprint—same rhythm, same register—so the piece improves structurally without sounding like someone else wrote it.
What types of content do you handle well?
Long- and short-form: blog posts, landing/product pages, email sequences, investor or strategy memos, academic sections (intro, methods, discussion), case studies, reports, slide narratives, grants, and fiction scenes. I focus on flow, argument strength, payoff clarity, and action-driving CTAs tailored to the piece’s goal.
What does the output look like, exactly?
A numbered list of issues and fixes. Each item includes Location, an Issue with bolded diagnosis (e.g., **Missing explicit takeaway**), and a Suggestion that rewrites or directs the change in your style. I apply the Claim–Support–Takeaway and What–Why–How frameworks, then add other developmental edits (structure, ordering, tension, examples, CTAs), plus synthesis notes when consolidating overlapping edits.
Any limitations or best practices I should know?
Best: include audience, goal, and constraints; paste full context; share tone samples. Limitations: I don’t replace subject-matter expertise or legal review, and you should verify facts and proprietary claims. For sensitive material, redact confidential details before pasting.