Assistente Acadêmico (Resumos e Resenhas Críticas)-academic summaries and critiques
AI-powered academic summaries and critical reviews.

Seu assistente acadêmico especializado em criar resenhas, fichamentos e resumos esquematizados a partir de artigos e textos, inclusive em outros idiomas. Visa a eficiência e compreensão no estudo de textos científicos.
Get Embed Code
Overview and Design Purpose
Assistente Acadêmico (Resumos e Resenhas Críticas) is a specialized academic aide focused on transforming scholarly texts—books, articles, dissertations—into rigorous outputs such as critical reviews (resenhas), fichamentos (including analytical/critical versions), and structured academic summaries. It is designed to: - read from multiple sources (pasted text, links, or uploaded files) and work carefully through the material before writing; - preserve the author’s intent while clarifying arguments, methods, evidence, and conclusions; - produce outputs aligned with Brazilian academic standards (ABNT NBR 14724, 6023, 10520) for structure, references, and citations; - support multilingual inputs with contextualized translation into Portuguese, retaining nuance and terminology; - avoid inventing content beyond the source, privileging accurate condensation and critical evaluation. Illustrative scenarios: • A graduate student uploads a 40-page empirical paper in English and requests a 1,200-word critical review in Portuguese, formatted to ABNT. The assistant identifies research questions, methods, results, and theoretical framing; then it critiques internal validity, compares with a canonical study, andAssistente Acadêmico functions delivers a review with a proper reference list. • A first-year undergrad pastes a chapter on social constructivism and asks for a fichamento. The assistant extracts key concepts, pivotal quotes (with location markers if provided), definitions, examples, and author cross-references, producing a succinct study document. • A lecturer shares an open-access link to a policy paper and asks for a schematic (outline-style) summary for classroom slides. The assistant outputs a hierarchical map of claims, evidence, limitations, and implications that can be pasted directly into presentation software.
Primary Functions and Practical Application
Analytical Synthesis: Critical Reviews, Fichamentos (incl. critical), and Academic Summaries
Example
A master's student in Education needs a critical review of a Portuguese translation of an English article on formative assessment. The assistant: (1) introduces the work and author; (2) summarizes central arguments and evidence; (3) critiques methodology (sample size, instruments, validity), situates the piece among related authors, and discusses implications; (4) concludes with academic significance; (5) produces ABNT-compliant references and in-text citations.
Scenario
Use when you need a polished, citable text derived from a source document. Inputs may be a PDF, URL, or pasted excerpt. The assistant preserves voice neutrality, flags unsupported claims, and can compare the work to key literature to position it in the field. Ideal for resenhas for coursework, literature-review building blocks, and pre-publication peer feedback.
Structured Schematic Summaries (Outline-style study aids)
Example
An undergraduate in Nursing preparing for an exam uploads an RCT article about a new intervention. The assistant produces a schematic digest with: context and relevance; methodology (design, sample, instruments); main findings; effect sizes (if provided); limitations; and implications for practice—organized in a tidy hierarchy for quick review.
Scenario
Use for fast comprehension, revision, and slide creation. The schematic format highlights primary vs. secondary ideas, variables, and evidence. It is especially helpful for dense or data-heavy texts, and it can include glossaries of key terms or concept maps when the material is theory-laden.
Guided Q&A and Assessment Generation
Example
A professor assigns Paulo Freire’s chapter and requests eight comprehension questions with model answers. The assistant produces a balanced set (factual recall, conceptual understanding, application, and critique), each answer keyed with brief rationales and page/section pointers when available.
Scenario
Use to test understanding, run study groups, or flip the classroom. The assistant adapts difficulty (e.g., Bloom’s taxonomy), focuses questions on figures/tables/methods where relevant, and can include short prompts for debate or reflection to foster critical engagement.
Who Benefits Most
Undergraduate and Graduate Students (including international students writing in Portuguese)
They gain accurate, well-structured syntheses that save time, improve comprehension of complex readings, and produce ABNT-compliant outputs (resenhas, fichamentos, summaries). Multilingual support helps students working with sources in English/Spanish while needing deliverables in Portuguese. Typical goals: exam preparation, coursework submissions, TCC chapters, and early literature reviews.
Faculty, Teaching Assistants, and Researchers
They benefit from classroom-ready outlines, question banks with answers, and rapid turnarounds on reading digests for seminars. Researchers can use concise summaries to scan large volumes of literature, extract comparable method/results blocks, and generate ABNT-formatted reference lists that align with institutional requirements.
How to Use Assistente Acadêmico (Resumos e Resenhas Críticas)
Visit
Visit aichatonline.org for a free trial without login, also no need for ChatGPT Plus.
Prepare your source
Gather the text you want analyzed: pasteable excerpts, a public URL, or a document (e.g., PDF/TXT/DOCX). Have basic metadata handy (author, title, year) if you want ABNT-formatted references.
Choose a service & scope
Select Review, Critical Review, Fichamento (incl. critical), or Structured Summary. Specify language (Portuguese or English), target length (words/pages), and any focus areas, questions, or sections to emphasize.
Provide constraints
State citation style (ABNT), level of depth, comparison needs, and whether translation or paraphrase is required. For best results, include key terms, theoretical frameworks, and evaluation criteria you care about.
Refine & export
Review the output, request adjustments (more/less critical stance, add evidence, sharpen conclusions), and ask for ABNT-compliant references/citations. Copy the final text into your editor or LMS.
Try other advanced and practical GPTs
Medical Linguist
AI-powered medical rewording with precision.

Desktop Application Developer
AI-powered copilot for rapid, robust desktop apps.

Cinematic AI - Text to Video Simplified
AI-powered text into video, fast.

Copilot
AI-powered copilot that writes, codes, and researches.

California Family Law Guide
AI-powered guide to California family law.

Common App
AI-powered guidance to craft standout university application essays.

Anti-GPT
AI-powered text refinement for any need.

产业链分析专家0315_v2
AI-powered industry-chain mapping & scoring.

Conlang Creator and Enhancer
AI-powered conlang design and evolution, end-to-end.

Developmental EditorBot - CE 101
AI-powered developmental edits for clarity, flow, and impact.

Beautiful.ai Presentation Maker
AI-powered slides from outline to wow.

The Simulation
AI-powered solutions for your creative needs.

- Literature Review
- Note Taking
- Critical Summary
- Citation Help
- ABNT Formatting
What exactly can you produce?
I create academic reviews, critical reviews, fichamentos (including critical fichamentos), and structured summaries. I extract core arguments, methods, evidence, and limitations; contrast positions; and synthesize conclusions following a clear academic template.
Do you support ABNT standards?
Yes. I structure sections in line with Brazilian academic conventions and format references/citations according to ABNT (e.g., NBR 14724 for academic works, NBR 6023 for references, NBR 10520 for citations) when you provide the necessary metadata.
Can you work with multiple languages and translate?
I detect the text’s language and can translate or summarize into Portuguese while preserving nuance. I can also produce outputs in English and compare terminology across languages when helpful.
How do I get the best results?
Provide clean text or a reliable URL, specify the product (review/fichamento/summary), target length, audience, required standards (ABNT), and any lenses (e.g., theoretical framework, methodology critique). Share author/title/year to ensure precise references.
Will you invent sources or content?
No. I prioritize your provided material and avoid fabricating references. If a reference is incomplete, I flag missing fields or insert placeholders for you to verify before final submission.