文献综述之王-AI literature review generator

Example

Transform a broad interest (e.g., "climate change and migration") into a focused review question (e.g., "How does slow-onset climate change affect internal migration patterns in Southeast Asia since 2000?").

Scenario

A PhD candidate provides a general interest area; 文献综述之王 suggests specific sub-questions, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and a prioritized list of keywords and database queries to retrieve relevant literature. This reduces wasted searching and yields a clear scope for the review.

Example

Produce boolean search strings for databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed), suggest gray literature sources, and propose a PRISMA-style screening flow (records identified, screened, included).

Scenario

A multidisciplinary team lacks information retrieval expertise. 文献综述之王 generates reproducible search queries, recommends databases for each discipline, and provides a screening rubric (population, exposure, outcomes, study design) that team members can use to screen papers consistently.

Example

For 25 included empirical studies, generate structured summaries including aim, sample, methods, key findings, strengths/limitations, and a comparative table that highlights methodological heterogeneity.

Scenario

A systematic literature review requires extracting comparable data across studies. 文献综述之王 produces standardized extraction templates and draft paragraphs that synthesize patterns (e.g., consistent effect directions, measurement differences), saving many hours of manual summarization.

Example

Identify recurring themes (e.g., theoretical frameworks, common interventions, measurement approaches) and produce a cohesive narrative that links themes, evidence strength, and contradictions.

Scenario

A journal manuscript needs a literature review section. 文献综述之王 organizes the literature into logically ordered subsections (background → theoretical lenses → empirical evidence → limitations → gaps) and writes polished prose that connects ideas and references studies appropriately.

Example

Highlight common methodological limitations across studies (small samples, cross-sectional designs, inconsistent metrics) and translate these into concrete research gaps and suggested future study designs.

Scenario

A grant reviewer or PI needs to justify a novel longitudinal design. 文献综述之王 produces a succinct list of methodological shortcomings in existing work and frames how the proposed project addresses them—helpful for statements of significance and innovation.

Example

Output formatted reference lists in common styles (APA, Chicago, Vancouver) and provide inline citation suggestions for the synthesized text.

Scenario

Preparing a submission for a specific journal, a postdoc requests references formatted to the target journal style. 文献综述之王 generates a clean, exportable bibliography and checks citation consistency across the review.

Example

Create evidence matrices, timeline charts showing the publication trend, and PRISMA-like diagrams summarizing the search and screening process.

Scenario

A policy brief requires visuals. 文献综述之王 outputs an evidence map that shows where strong evidence exists versus where evidence is scarce, enabling policymakers to quickly grasp research densities and blind spots.

Example

Produce publishable drafts of introduction, thematic sections, and conclusions; rewrite for concision or for a different audience (academic vs. policy).

Scenario

A non-native English researcher has solid content but needs language polishing. 文献综述之王 rewrites paragraphs to meet high academic language standards while preserving technical accuracy and citations.