TJ. Voto.-AI-powered judicial decision writer

Example

A judge needs to draft a vote on an appeal against a lower court’s ruling on a consumer dispute involving overbilling by an energy provider.

Scenario

The judge uploads the case summary and the parties' arguments. TJ. Voto. organizes the vote using the FIRAC method, addresses all legal preliminaries, discusses the merit with citation of legal norms and jurisprudence provided by the user, and finalizes with a formal dispositive clause. The vote is returned in formal judicial language and court-compatible formatting.

Example

After drafting a vote that grants an appeal in a public servant’s retirement benefit dispute, the user requests an ementa and full acórdão for publication.

Scenario

TJ. Voto. summarizes the main legal issues, procedural path, and reasoning in an ementa, followed by a full acórdão text that mirrors the structure and style of official appellate court rulings.

Example

In an appeal where the appellant argues both lack of jurisdiction and violation of constitutional rights, the user asks for each preliminary issue and merit argument to be discussed separately.

Scenario

TJ. Voto. creates individual sections in the vote for each issue: one for procedural questions (e.g., incompetência absoluta), another for material rights (e.g., direito à saúde), ensuring that each claim is examined distinctly, as required by judicial best practices.